SAF 44 turning in their graves over Ombudsman and Poe

by Rigoberto Tiglao on July 23, 2015

It will be six months to the day tomorrow when the nation was shocked by the massacre of 44 of its most elite PNP unit, the Special Action Forces.

They must be turning in their graves over two recent developments.

The more recent one is Ombudsman Conchita Carpio -Morales’s exoneration the other day of President Aquino for any complicity in the massacre. Her investigators claimed that that “whatever participation the President in the incident does not amount prima facie [“based on a first impression”] to a criminal offense, neither was his participation analogous to any of the impeachable offenses.”

But by Aquino’s own account, it was he who oversaw the operation, and worse, appointed as his operations man his bosom friend former police chief Alan Purisima, who at that time had no authority to do so as he had been suspended over a graft investigation, and was totally out of the chain of command.

How can the Ombudsman say there is no “first impression” that Aquino was involved in the operation?

Poor Purisima: The Ombudsman is now charging him for “usurpation of official functions.” But wasn’t it Aquino who allowed him to “usurp”? Could he have “usurped” if Aquino didn’t ask him to? Could he even have entered Malacañang where the meetings were held in which he usurped the functions?

So what happened? Top photo, in March when Llamanzares put Mamasapano Massacre blame on Aquino. Lower left, the horrific killings. Right, dinner with Aquino for his endorsement.

So what happened? Top photo, in March when Llamanzares put Mamasapano Massacre blame on Aquino. Lower left, the horrific killings. Right, dinner with Aquino for his endorsement.

Did the Ombudsman subpoena Purisima’s cellphone, which contained the smoking gun of Aquino’s complicity? This is because Purisima’s transcript of his conversations with Aquino on that day had a five-hour inexplicable gap in the afternoon, which obviously indicates he didn’t want to disclose other orders from and conversations with the President.

Now we know why Aquino, as soon as he assumed office in June 2010, removed Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez, bullying her with the threat of impeachment. Poor Gutierrez didn’t have the money to hire lawyers in an impeachment trial.

But the souls of the SAF 44 may be groaning louder over Senator Grace Poe-Llamanzares.

Massacre created a star

It was in the hearings on the Mamasapano Massacre of the Senate Committee on Public Order which she headed (jointly with the committee on Peace, Unification and Reconciliation), that the “star was born,” as it were. She broke out of her balikbayan, top movie-censor persona to portray herself as not only an intelligent and articulate senator but also a principled one with the courage to proclaim that Aquino had to bear responsibility for the massacre.

We were all pleasantly surprised by her independence and boldness. The banner headline of The Philippine Daily Inquirer, which has recently been rooting for her as the next president, was in extra-large fonts, “The buck stops with the President”, with a one-fourth paged photo of her in a dramatic pose as if she were the personification of the Goddess of Justice.

It was clever of her of course that she monopolized the press conference when she released the report, even if it was a joint report of the Peace and Order committee she headed, the Committee on Peace, Unification, and Reconciliation headed by Senator Teofisto Guingona III, and the Finance/Subcommittee A, headed by Senator Francis Escudero.

It was not her being “Panday’s” daughter (although that helped) but her stellar performance in the Senate’s televised hearings investigating the Mamasapano Massacre that catapulted her into the political firmament of potential presidents. (Which raises the question, what issue could help her maintain such a high political altitude?)

And why shouldn’t she?

After the Llamanzares’ show, it’s still “pending’. Senate website’s description of the Mamasapano investigation.

After the Llamanzares’ show, it’s still “pending’. Senate website’s description of the Mamasapano investigation.

The present Senate is the worst of all senates after Marcos’ fall, consisting mostly of Aquino lackeys, narcissists lusting for the presidency or vice-presidency at all costs, and cowards bludgeoned to silence by the threat that they would be made to join Enrile, Jinggoy, and Bong in jail if they didn’t cooperate — even if only silently — with this Yellow Regime.

But what did she do after she portrayed herself as the Goddess of Justice that would avenge the fallen SAF 44 with her explosive draft Mamasapano report, dramatically reading lengthy excerpts of it in well-planned press conference?


Such reports by Senate committees are supposed to be “reported out” or presented to the entire Senate, so senators who weren’t members of the committees that investigate the issue could critique it or contribute to it.

Llamanzares didn’t.

So technically, the much-ballyhooed Mamasapano Report isn’t at all a Senate report, and its status is merely: “Pending Second Reading, Ordinary Business.” That means it still has to be taken up, debated, amended, if necessary, then approved by the entire Senate in plenary. Since it is just a report of the Senate’s many committees, and not a report of the Senate itself, historians in the future may not even find Poe’s much-ballyhooed report in its archives.

An incredulous press pressured her to explain why she didn’t report it out to the Senate. She replied lamely, as if she didn’t know that it was standard procedure to do so, and that it cannot just be treated upon her whim: “The report is about facts and findings. The Ombudsman acknowledged receipt of our recommendations. I will no longer present in plenary. The BBL plenary discussion can tackle any remaining questions on Mamasapano.”

Compelling reason

There is of course one compelling reason why she wouldn’t have the Senate in plenary (as a whole) discussing it. Aquino’s complicity in the massacre would be further exposed in public, and the other senators who were not members of the investigating committees may demand further hearings.

It may even get out of control and create such public outrage for Aquino to step down, especially if it is proven, as this newspaper alleged, the he ordered the army to stand down and not rescue the trapped SAF, for the sake of the peace talks with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.

The senators for instance could have subpoenaed mobile-phone company’s records that would show how many times Aquino called Purisima on that tragic day, which would prove without the shadow of a doubt that the President supervised the debacle.

What kind of country have we become?

Forty-four of our finest troops were massacred, even stripped of their pants to humiliate them, and there are strong indications that the President refused to save them. Yet the Senate stops in finding out what really happened, what Aquino did or did not do?

And the senator partly responsible for not pursuing the investigation is running for President?

It is indeed strange that after being in the limelight in March pinpointing blame on Aquino, she hasn’t said a word about the massacre since then.

Why didn’t she pursue an issue that catapulted her to stardom as a much-admired senator, enough for opinion-poll respondents to think that somebody who had renounced her country could be President?

The answer has stared us in the face in the past weeks, as Aquino dropped hints he might not anoint his sidekick Mar Roxas as the Liberal Party’s presidential candidate and especially with the President having a six-hour dinner with Llamanzares, her Svengali Senator Escudero, and Roxas discussing scenarios for the 2016 elections.

It wasn’t just Llamanzares’ high ratings in presidential voter-preference polls that made Aquino agonize on who to choose as his anointed.

Aquino would be stupid not to have realized that what Llamanzares did in the case of the Mamasapano massacre was a clear message: “I can go against you, or I can save your skin, especially when you step down from power. Why choose Mar?”

In past columns, I have been arguing that we should move our belligerent stance against China several notches down. We should also stop those juvenile and really useless boycott-China noises that definitely won’t change Chinese government policy but only enrage the Chinese masses, which would take decades to repair.

The arbitration case we filed against China in the UN Permanent Court of Arbitration will be nearly useless for us, but a boon for the US.

If — and it’s a big “if” — the Court assumes jurisdiction, which is their first ruling that would take four months from now, it would take five years for it to rule on the suit, which is its track record in other less-complicated cases.

And in those five years, our relationship with the economic superpower in the region gets colder and colder to freezing point, with our neighbors Cambodia and even Vietnam, a claimant in the South China Sea, laughing at us they get tens of billions of dollars in Chinese official development assistance, trade, and investments.

And if, and that’s a big “if”, the Court rules in our favor, China will simply ignore the decision. The Aquino administration thinks that this will turn China into an international pariah, and be forced to give up its claims.

That’s extremely naive thinking. Life will just go in the world and in the region, as long as China doesn’t invade the other islands Taiwan, Vietnam, and the Philippines occupy. Can the Court issue a TRO to Beijing on its reclamation work on the shoals it occupies?

But really, could you compare that kind of disregard for international law if China ignores the arbitral court’s ruling to the two superpowers’ blatant violations of international law with their invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, and Georgia that cost thousands of lives? Turkey invaded in 1974 a sovereign country, Cyprus, and still occupies a third of it. Is Turkey an international pariah?

Facsimile of the WSJ (Asia Edition): What the newspaper announced to the world.

Facsimile of the WSJ (Asia Edition): What the newspaper announced to the world.

If the Court rules against China, will we feel secured in our “ownership” of the Kalayaan Island Group, with its second biggest island in the area Pag-Asa?

The Vietnam claim

Nope. The Vietnamese also claim those islands, saying that the French included it in what would be Vietnam in 1933. Marcos declared that group to be Philippine territory only in 1978, after maritime-school operator Tomas Cloma claimed it as his new nation of “Freedomland” in 1956.

Now, since we declared to the world that we bow to international courts to rule on sovereignty issues in the Spratlys, would we agree to let the same UN Permanent Arbitral Court to rule on whether the Kalayaan Island Group belongs to us or to the Vietnamese?

But the one who would benefit really from the Court decision on our pending suit would be the US, as it would have more public-opinion room to be the sole superpower in this region, halfway around the world from it. The Court decision will portray China as a bad superpower in the region, with the US the good one. Washington will uncork its champagne to celebrate that it’s achieved President Obama’s “pivot to Asia” goal within his term. As in the 1950s, we have proven to be the very reliable US puppet.

The reality of the world is that sovereignty over lands has never been determined by Courts, but by military power. The Falkland Islands, 300 kilometers from the Argentinian coast, will always be territory of the British who are 6,000 kilometers away because of its military might. So will Gibraltar. Did Argentina, Spain (which claims Gibraltar), and the UK ever ask a court to rule who really owns what? Certainly not.

What we need to do though, as I have explained in past columns, is do diplomacy, smile at the Chinese, send as many trade and cultural missions to China as we can, ask our Chinese-Filipino taipans to massage down the Chinese anger at us, while we fortify the seven islands and two shoals we occupy in the Spratly islands.

While realistically we can’t build fortresses that would repel the Chinese in a full-scale war, we have to build some “minimum credible deterrent.” In layman’s terms, that means our forces in the disputed territories must be able to do battle with an invading Chinese force, which would hopefully turn world opinion to our side. But how would the five to six-man squads, armed only with assault rifles stationed at most of the seven islands do this?

It’s one of Aquino’s biggest boo-boos during his administration that he virtually asked China to a fight — by arresting its fishermen and then sending the only warship we have to defend our arresting coast guard men, only to withdraw two days later –when our military modernization program is still in the drawing boards. It’s like a kid challenging a bigger one to a fight, but then backing down as soon as the gauntlet is picked up.

This administration for all its chest thumping and saber rattling hasn’t been able to strengthen our military to build even the most minimum credible deterrent.

Obviously we expected too much from a government that can’t even fix the main mass transport in Metro Manila, the MRT-3 line.

Follows are excerpts from a July 20 Wall Street Journal (Asia Edition) front-paged article entitled “Philippine Military Upgrade Stalls,” which I hope doesn’t encourage the Chinese from invading our Spratly possessions tomorrow:

“A string of programs collectively valued at $1 billion stalled early last year, according to military officials and executives involved in Philippine defense deals.

“The delay underscores how the government’s efforts to transform the country’s derelict navy and air force have become mired in red tape, funding problems and corruption allegations.

“The delays leave long-held plans to build a ‘minimum credible deterrent’—comprising small but capable air and naval fleets—at least a decade from completion, said Jose Antonio Custodio, a Manila-based defense consultant. Even with a basic deterrent in place today, Manila would likely still lack the means to check Beijing’s assertiveness.

“ ‘We’re still at square one,’ said Mr. Custodio. ‘With China building all these new bases [in the South China Sea], I’d say it’s already too late.’

“President Benigno Aquino III has promised to rejuvenate the military, degraded by decades of underinvestment. A pledge to spend $1.7 billion on new equipment initially bore fruit, as the administration signed a flurry of defense contracts valued at $834 million in late 2013 and early 2014, including deals for 12 Korean fighter jets, three Airbus transport planes and a new fleet of combat helicopters from Canada and the U.K.

“ ‘The record will show that the Aquino administration has stepped up the pace of [military modernization] considerably, surpassing the procurement program undertaken by three previous administrations combined,’ presidential spokesman Herminio Coloma said.

“Aquino didn’t sign law”

“However, Mr. Coloma also confirmed that Mr. Aquino still hasn’t signed a law earmarking a further $2 billion for defense procurement that was passed by congress in February 2013. Mr. Coloma didn’t explain the delay.

“Government finances have been stretched thin after the government spent billions on reconstruction following Supertyphoon Haiyan in 2013, a fact Mr. Custodio, the defense consultant, cited for the spending delay.

“Already strict government procurement rules have been further tightened since then, putting the brakes on a range of spending programs.

“Contracts for two naval frigates valued at $398 million and for two long-range patrol planes valued at $132 million—capabilities that would help the Philippines monitor its maritime territory, where it has overlap the ping claims with China—are among those that were scheduled to have been bid out last year, but are instead stuck on the drawing board.

“ ‘It seems that all programs are paralyzed,’ said a Western defense executive whose company is involved in one stalled project.

“With China accelerating its island program in the South China Sea, Philippine military chief General Gregorio Pio Catapang recently urged Manila to spend more on defense as the country’s economy enjoys healthy growth. Last year’s defense budget was just $3.3 billion— less than neighboring Singapore’s ($9.5 billion), Indonesia’s ($7.5 billion), and Malaysia’s ($4.9 billion).

“A Philippines senate inquiry into country’s military modernization efforts has meanwhile questioned the effectiveness of the funds spent so far, with one senator arguing there was practically nothing to show for the $1.4 billion spent on new weaponry in the decade to 2013. Senators also probed a deal for 21 secondhand helicopters, which the defense department canceled in April after only seven deliveries amid concerns about the quality of the technology, and with a Philippine tax official claiming that the aircraft had been ordered in exchange for kickbacks.

“The breakdown of the helicopter program has made defense officials even more reluctant to place new orders and expose themselves to further scrutiny, said Mr. Custodio.

“Mr. Aquino has turned to allies for help. On a recent state visit to Japan, he requested secondhand P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, having already received a $183 million loan from Tokyo to fund the construction of 10 new patrol boats. Tokyo has said it is considering the requests, though it hasn’t committed to anything specific. Australia, South Korea and the U.S. have all donated used military kit to Manila in recent years and have signaled a willingness to do more.

“But hand-me-downs won’t deliver a deterrent capable of influencing decision makers in Beijing, Mr. Custodio says. ‘The Chinese are building islands on our doorstep.’ “

Aquino’s ‘six-hour dinner:’ That’s how damaged PH democracy has become

July 19, 2015

The Philippine Daily Inquirer expectedly glamorized it with its puerile headlines “Guess who’s coming to dinner?” and “Stand-off at Palace dinner.” They were referring to President Aquino’s six-hour dinner last Wednesday with Mar Roxas, senators Grace Poe Llamanzares and Francis Escudero, who purportedly would run in the 2016 elections. For what positions exactly, is anybody’s [...]

Read the full article →

Lacson: ‘Aquino’s DAP reincarnated in 2015 Budget’

July 16, 2015

Remember President Aquino’s blatant hijacking of the budget in 2012 to 2013, masked as the Disbursement Acceleration Plan (DAP)? It raised the hundreds of millions of pesos in pork barrel-like funds, which, with the regular pork barrel money, “convinced” the 20 senators to remove from office Chief Justice Renato Corona on the flimsy ground of [...]

Read the full article →

Aquino stunned, livid over Lacson’s P424-B hidden pork accusations

July 14, 2015

President Benigno Aquino 3rd was stunned and blew his top yesterday over his – erstwhile? – ally, former Senator Panfilo Lacson’s revelations that the 2015 Budget has a huge component of P424 billion in so-called “lump-sum appropriations.” These are the kinds of nearly discretionary funds Aquino and his camp could easily use to build up [...]

Read the full article →

Aquino, Liberal Party, in near panic

July 12, 2015

Eleven months to the May 9, 2016 elections, and with the deadline for the filing of certificates of candidacy just three months away, President Aquino and his Liberal Party are now in near panic, worried that their presumptive candidate, Mar Roxas, has little chance of winning the Presidency. Aquino’s camp has also been told that [...]

Read the full article →

The Euro, German and French banks did Greece in

July 9, 2015

How the heck could Greece, a nation of just 11 million souls (probably Metro Manila’s daytime population), rack up total foreign debts of €320 billion ($352 billion), or $32,000 per Greek, so that the country’s default now threatens the stability not only of Europe but even the world financial system? To put that amount in [...]

Read the full article →

Use ‘BBL’ and CCT funds to defend our Kalayaan sovereignty

July 7, 2015

Fourth of a series on the Spratly crisis First Part 1: Congress should probe Aquino, Trillanes and del Rosario Part 2: China reclaims, fortifies territories; What does Aquino do? Part 3: Aquino gave China reason for reclamation My past three columns on the Spratly issue argued the following: • We cannot rely on international law, [...]

Read the full article →

Aquino gave China reason for reclamation

July 5, 2015

Third of a series on the Spratly crisis Part 1: Congress should probe Aquino, Trillanes and del Rosario Part 2: China reclaims, fortifies territories; What does Aquino do? Part 4:Use ‘BBL’ and CCT funds to defend our Kalayaan sovereignty I’m starting to think that the Chinese Communist Party has a secret agent at the highest [...]

Read the full article →

The Ombudsman: Aquino’s top political assassin … and undertaker

July 2, 2015

It is astonishing that Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales still found the gall to berate the press the other day in an unexpected palengkera language: “Nabubuwisit na ako. Wala nang ginawang tama ang Ombudsman! Palagi niyo nang kinukwestiyon. If you feel that I am impeachable if I have done wrong, I welcome it. I will give my [...]

Read the full article →